Choose a model for the work you need to doMe
← Use casesEducation & teaching

Question banks & learning assessment

Design practice and assessment around objectives, check coverage, difficulty, and answers, then improve the question bank using actual responses.

What to prepare

Inputs

Learning objectives, topic scope, question types, examples, scoring rules, and response data.

What to produce

Deliverables

Questions and explanations, scoring rubrics, objective coverage, and item-quality analysis.

Step-by-step workflow

Break the work into verifiable stages, then choose models and supporting tools.

  1. 01

    Build an assessment blueprint

    Allocate question types and coverage by objective, distinguishing recall, understanding, and practical application.

  2. 02

    Generate questions and scoring guidance

    Request answers, derivations, common mistakes, and scoring criteria alongside each question.

  3. 03

    Verify questions independently

    Check numerical questions with code and ensure open-ended rubrics are clear and repeatable.

  4. 04

    Revise using response data

    Calculate item difficulty, discrimination, and missingness, then check ambiguity and unfair conditions.

Required model capabilities

Combine models for the actual stages. The directory includes candidates matching one or more of these capabilities.

View matching models

Supporting tools

Question bank systemCalculation verification environmentTeacher review & scored examples

Selection & delivery checks

  • Verify generated answers independently; an output cannot certify its own correctness.
  • Eliminate unintended multiple answers, leaked clues, and ambiguous options.
  • Evaluate automated scoring against teacher-scored examples first.

An example request

Write questions, worked answers, and scoring rules from course goals. Verify calculations in Python, analyze responses, and identify items to revise.
Find models for this request

Related scenarios

All scenarios