Literature reviews & evidence matrices
Organize literature around a research question, compare populations, methods, findings, and limitations, and link each conclusion to specific papers.
Inputs
Research question, search scope, paper PDFs or full-text links, and comparison dimensions.
Deliverables
A sourced evidence matrix, thematic review, disagreements, and research gaps.
Step-by-step workflow
Break the work into verifiable stages, then choose models and supporting tools.
- 01
Define the search scope
Specify populations, topics, dates, and inclusion criteria. Search academic databases and record the queries.
- 02
Extract evidence from papers
Use document understanding to read text, charts, and tables. Standardize study design, samples, methods, and results.
- 03
Compare across papers
Compare supporting and conflicting evidence. Add vector retrieval for larger collections while retaining pages and excerpts.
- 04
Verify and write the review
Recheck citations, samples, and numerical results. Mark evidence gaps when full text is unavailable.
Required model capabilities
Combine models for the actual stages. The directory includes candidates matching one or more of these capabilities.
View matching modelsSupporting tools
Selection & delivery checks
- Compare long-document understanding, table recognition, and citation location.
- Distinguish original findings from speculation; abstracts are not substitutes for full papers.
- Verify titles, authors, years, and DOIs against original sources.
An example request
Review the 30 papers I provide: read PDF charts, retrieve supporting evidence, compare methods, summarize disagreements, and cite source pages for each conclusion.Find models for this request