Choose a model for the work you need to doMe
← Use casesAcademic research

Research design & hypotheses

Use existing evidence to define research questions, measurable variables, experimental conditions, and an analysis plan that can be reviewed and implemented.

What to prepare

Inputs

Background, prior findings, available data, constraints, and hypotheses to test.

What to produce

Deliverables

Research questions, variable definitions, experiment outline, analysis plan, and testable hypotheses.

Step-by-step workflow

Break the work into verifiable stages, then choose models and supporting tools.

  1. 01

    Break down the research question

    Separate the phenomenon, existing evidence, and uncertain hypotheses into a question tree.

  2. 02

    Design variables and controls

    List measurement methods, controls, and potential confounders, explaining each choice.

  3. 03

    Evaluate the analysis plan

    Generate power analysis or simulation code, run it in statistical software, and retain parameters.

  4. 04

    Prepare a reviewable plan

    Document procedures, data fields, exclusion rules, and failure criteria for researcher review before execution.

Required model capabilities

Combine models for the actual stages. The directory includes candidates matching one or more of these capabilities.

View matching models

Supporting tools

Statistical computing environmentResearch protocol templateData dictionary

Selection & delivery checks

  • Prioritize traceable reasoning and explicit assumptions.
  • Determine sample sizes through effect sizes, test methods, and power calculations rather than model guesses.
  • Record exploratory work separately from pre-specified confirmatory analysis.

An example request

Derive testable hypotheses from existing research, design a controlled experiment, simulate statistical power in Python, and produce a protocol and analysis plan.
Find models for this request

Related scenarios

All scenarios